That code is messy. And it was buggy. Noticed by valgrind.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
/* if our samples are short and we aren't too FAST*/
if (entry[0].sec - entry[-1].sec < 30 && entry->velocity < FAST) {
int past = -2;
- while (pi->entry <= entry-past && entry[0].sec - entry[past].sec < 30)
+ while (i+past > 0 && entry[0].sec - entry[past].sec < 30)
past--;
entry->velocity = velocity((entry[0].val - entry[past].val) /
(entry[0].sec - entry[past].sec));