X-Git-Url: http://git.tdb.fi/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=dive.c;h=8c81a3d516702bb9ecac67f2ee40fb82088d6e0a;hb=6138d151e9156bdf15843b1b54104428c5124e38;hp=2ecd10cb0be418f524736c0ab227930d343abc6c;hpb=1e75ceac0dbbf6a6eef1e13f076c3ae6a7af4c55;p=ext%2Fsubsurface.git

diff --git a/dive.c b/dive.c
index 2ecd10c..8c81a3d 100644
--- a/dive.c
+++ b/dive.c
@@ -3,6 +3,30 @@
 
 #include "dive.h"
 
+/*
+ * So when we re-calculate maxdepth and meandepth, we will
+ * not override the old numbers if they are close to the
+ * new ones.
+ *
+ * Why? Because a dive computer may well actually track the
+ * max depth and mean depth at finer granularity than the
+ * samples it stores. So it's possible that the max and mean
+ * have been reported more correctly originally.
+ *
+ * Only if the values calculated from the samples are clearly
+ * different do we override the normal depth values.
+ *
+ * This considers 1m to be "clearly different". That's
+ * a totally random number.
+ */
+static void update_depth(depth_t *depth, int new)
+{
+	int old = depth->mm;
+
+	if (abs(old - new) > 1000)
+		depth->mm = new;
+}
+
 struct dive *fixup_dive(struct dive *dive)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -18,7 +42,7 @@ struct dive *fixup_dive(struct dive *dive)
 		struct sample *sample = dive->sample + i;
 		int time = sample->time.seconds;
 		int depth = sample->depth.mm;
-		int press = sample->tankpressure.mbar;
+		int press = sample->cylinderpressure.mbar;
 		int temp = sample->temperature.mkelvin;
 
 		if (lastdepth)
@@ -50,15 +74,16 @@ struct dive *fixup_dive(struct dive *dive)
 		return dive;
 	dive->duration.seconds = end - start;
 	if (start != end)
-		dive->meandepth.mm = depthtime / (end - start);
+		update_depth(&dive->meandepth, depthtime / (end - start));
 	if (startpress)
 		dive->beginning_pressure.mbar = startpress;
 	if (endpress)
 		dive->end_pressure.mbar = endpress;
 	if (mintemp)
 		dive->watertemp.mkelvin = mintemp;
+
 	if (maxdepth)
-		dive->maxdepth.mm = maxdepth;
+		update_depth(&dive->maxdepth, maxdepth);
 
 	return dive;
 }
@@ -143,10 +168,10 @@ add_sample_b:
 			sample.depth = as->depth;
 		if (as->temperature.mkelvin)
 			sample.temperature = as->temperature;
-		if (as->tankpressure.mbar)
-			sample.tankpressure = as->tankpressure;
-		if (as->tankindex)
-			sample.tankindex = as->tankindex;
+		if (as->cylinderpressure.mbar)
+			sample.cylinderpressure = as->cylinderpressure;
+		if (as->cylinderindex)
+			sample.cylinderindex = as->cylinderindex;
 
 		res = add_sample(&sample, at, res);
 
@@ -174,6 +199,27 @@ static char *merge_text(const char *a, const char *b)
 	return res;
 }
 
+/* Pick whichever has any info (if either). Prefer 'a' */
+static void merge_cylinder_type(cylinder_type_t *res, cylinder_type_t *a, cylinder_type_t *b)
+{
+	if (a->size.mliter)
+		b = a;
+	*res = *b;
+}
+
+static void merge_cylinder_mix(gasmix_t *res, gasmix_t *a, gasmix_t *b)
+{
+	if (a->o2.permille)
+		b = a;
+	*res = *b;
+}
+
+static void merge_cylinder_info(cylinder_t *res, cylinder_t *a, cylinder_t *b)
+{
+	merge_cylinder_type(&res->type, &a->type, &b->type);
+	merge_cylinder_mix(&res->gasmix, &a->gasmix, &b->gasmix);
+}
+
 /*
  * This could do a lot more merging. Right now it really only
  * merges almost exact duplicates - something that happens easily
@@ -205,12 +251,8 @@ struct dive *try_to_merge(struct dive *a, struct dive *b)
 	MERGE_MIN(res, a, b, watertemp.mkelvin);
 	MERGE_MAX(res, a, b, beginning_pressure.mbar);
 	MERGE_MAX(res, a, b, end_pressure.mbar);
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_MIXES; i++) {
-		if (a->gasmix[i].o2.permille) {
-			res->gasmix[i] = a->gasmix[i];
-			continue;
-		}
-		res->gasmix[i] = b->gasmix[i];
-	}
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CYLINDERS; i++)
+		merge_cylinder_info(res->cylinder+i, a->cylinder + i, b->cylinder + i);
+
 	return merge_samples(res, a, b, 0);
 }